FUTURE DIRECTIONS, COLLABORATIONS
The colloquium concluded with individuals’ commitments
to engage in collaborate research, resource sharing and
peer review of resources developed at in Academic Development
Units.
Resource sharing
Further collaborative exercises were suggested including:
- Engaging in peer review of programs
- Locating a body of experts to be reviewers
- Developing a set of guidelines of what Benchmarking/Peer
Review might look like
- Exchange visits to witness how things are done in
different institutions
- Investigating the possibility of licensing arrangements
Ongoing discussions
To facilitate this, there would be on-going Listserver
discussions regarding
- Peer review of resources
- Induction of sessional teachers
- Induction of off-shore teachers
- Induction of workplace learning coordinators
Clearinghouse
There was discussion about pursuing the fIRST model
for funding effort in resource-sharing and resource development.
It was suggested that fIRST’s model of institutional subscription
could be useful provided it occurred under some form of
umbrella organisation. There was a strongly felt desire
for the Carrick Institute to act as clearinghouse for
resource templates and experts for reviews.
Research
It was proposed that systematic, sector-wide impact
research could be conducted to develop some standard evaluation
tools that range from:
- reflections by participants on value of workshops
- 6 month / 12 months follow-up participant interviews
- Pre-test and post-test (eg. via Student Evaluations
of teaching)
- It was recognised that we need to move beyond claims
of positive outcomes to generating tangible evidence.
Colloquium 2005
The Colloquium concluded with the announcement that University
of Tasmania had committed to act as conveners for the
Foundations Colloquium in Tasmania in 2005.
|