
Evaluation
Teacher's perspectives inventory
Types of peer review
Peer review guidelines
Questions for self appraisal
Self evaluation against principles of teaching
Suggestions for proceeding with peer review
Examples of peer review
Student evaluation of teaching
Evaluation in higher education entails gathering evidence about the impact of teaching, topic and course design on students' participation and achievement and the appropriateness of content and processes for intended purposes.
Effective evaluation of teaching and topics is the basis of good educational practice. Evaluation of teaching and topics must be done with a purpose. For evaluations to be effective and useful you need to clarify what is it that you want to know or to demonstrate about your teaching.
The are many possible purposes for assessing, sources of information and uses for which the evidence might be used.
Evaluation needs to be deliberate. In particular, it needs to be a continuous process.
Why Evaluate?
To judge the efficacy of specific teaching strategies, approaches and innovations so that:
- there can be some critical debate as to the worth and value of the strategies used
- others can appraise a teachers' effectiveness in the light of a performance appraisal for promotion purposes.
There are many possible purposes for assessing, sources of information and uses for which the evidence might be used.
- Changes to course structure
- Changes to teaching processes
- Changes to teaching content
- Changes to assessment tasks
- Changes to student work load
- Changes to student staff interactions
- Promotion and tenure
- Professional development
Types of Evaluation:
Formative
This is feedback for teacher development, and usually occurs early in the teaching process. Formative evaluation needs to be:
- specific
- relevant
- contextual
- diagnostic
Summative
This is judgement of effectiveness, and usually occurs at the end of the teaching process. Summative evaluation needs to be:
- valid,
- reliable
- based on data that measures quality

