Foot and Ankle Fractures
Ankle
Eponymous Types
- Maisonneuve
- either a med malleolus fracture or deltoid lig tear with a high fibular fracture
- Le Fort - Wagstaffe
- avulsion fracture of anterior margin of distal fibula at insertion of anterior tibio-fibular lig
- Tillaux-Chaput
- avulsion fracture of anterior tibial margin by the anterior tibio- fibular lig
- Volkmanns triangle
- the postero lat malleolar fracture
Classification: (Weber/ AO)
- Type A
- Transverse avulsion fracture of the fibula at the level of the ankle joint or below
Medial malleolus may be intact or sheared, and may be an associated compression fracture of the tibial edge
The tibio-fibular ligament complex is always intact
A1 isolated fibular fracture
A2 with fracture of med malleolus
A3 with a posteromedial fracture
- Type B
- Spiral fracture of the distal fibula beginning at the level of the syndesmosis
Part of the tibio-fibular syndesmotic ligament may be involved but the ankle mortise is stable following reduction of the fracture
B1 isolated fibular fracture
B2 with a med lesion ( malleolus or ligament)
B3 with a med lesion and fracture of posterolat tibia
- Type C
- Fracture of the fibula anywhere between the syndesmosis and the head of the fibula
The tibio-fibular ligament complex is always disrupted and diastasis screws should be inserted if it remains unstable after fixation of the fracture (ankle in neutral position when inserted)
C1 diaphyseal fracture of fibula- simple
C2 diaphyseal fracture of fibula- complex
C3 proximal fracture of fibula
Investigation
- XRay
- AP/lat/mortise views
stress views
- Tomograms
- CT
- If X-Rays show a displaced malleolar fracture there must be a ligament injury somewhere around the mortice
Ramsey and Hamilton (1976) showed that lateral displacement of the talus in the mortice of 1mm an average 42% loss of articular contact and congruency
Treatment
Nonoperative
- Indications
- for undisplaced or stable fractures
for displaced fractures when anatomical reduction can be obtained and maintained without repeated manipulation
when pt general condition does not permit
when operative treatment delayed
obtained by reversing the mechanism of injury
maintained by AKPOP for rotationally unstable injuries, 3- point molding, ankle at 90
Undisplaced or stable fractures can be managed in BKPOP, WB PRN
Operative
- Indications
- failure of CR
when CR requires forced, abnormal positioning of the foot
for displaced or unstable fractures that result in displacement of the talus or
widening of the mortise of more than 1-2 mm
- Aims
- restore fibular length
anatomical jt surface reconstruction
close mortise: anatomic reconstruction of the fibula usually restores the mortise and restores stability to the syndesmosis
Syndesmotic fixation if: tibiofibular diastasis +/- high fibular fracture
instability post ORIF of fibula
Diastasis screws should be tri-cortical and not lagged
remove prior to WB
posterior malleolus- fix if more than 25% of artic surface and displaced more than 2mm most reduce with the fibular reduction
A paper from Nottingham suggests that females over 50 have higher incidence of complications of operative treatment- however this is a retrospective review and their overall figures are not very impressive ( Beauchamp etal "displaced ankle fractures in patients over 50 yrs of age" JBJS 65B: 329-332, 1983).
Their recommendation must be viewed with a degree of caution . A prospective trial from Chicago suggests that ORIF gives a better result in pts who are more than 50 yo ( Phillips etal JBJS 67A: 67, 1985)
Complications
Bone
- nonunion
- most of the med malleolus treated with CR- due to interposed tissue
treat if symptomatic with ORIF + BG
- malunion
Wound
skin necrosis marginal necrosis in ~ 3%care in handling tissue etc- treat with dressings
Infection
less than 2%, treat infection, leave fixation until fracture healedArthritis
incidence with severity of injurydegen changes in 10% of anatomically fixed , 85% if not adequately reduced - changes apparent within 18 mths
ref: Klossner "Late results of operative and nonoperative treatment of severe ankle fractures" Acta Chir Scand Suppl. 293: 1-93, 1962
Prognosis
There is a reduction in the incidence of arthrosis in patients where an anatomical reduction has been achievedref: Phillips etal JBJS 67A: 67-78, 1985 Prospective trial shows higher total ankle scores in those that are operatively treated- especially so in those pts more than 50 yrs old
[ Back to the Top ]
Tillaux Fractures
Avulsion fracture of the anterolat distal tibia at site of attachment of the anterior tibio-fibular lig= SH3 fracture
[ Back to the Top ]
Triplane Fractures
Combine a Tillaux fracture with a type 2 S-H fracture
May be two or three part and fixation may cross the physis in these injuries as they occur when closure of the physis is imminent
Growth arrest occurs in 14% of all ankle fractures in the skeletally immature and appearance may be delayed for up to six months therefore need to check growth at one year
Treatment
ORIFPrognosis
Residual displacement of 2mm or more after reduction is associated with a less than optimal result unless the epiphyseal fracture was outside the weight bearing area of the ankle[ Back to the Top ]
Talus
Anatomy
The talus has 7 articular facets and no muscular attachments60% of the surface area is cartilage problems with the blood supply which is via an anastomosis between the anterior tibial, posterior tibial and the peroneal vessels
- posterior tibial artery
- deltoid branches- supply med 1/3 of body
artery of the tarsal canal- anastomoses with artery of sinus tarsi
beneath neck of talus
- ant tibial artery(dorsalis pedis)
- multiple branches to dorsal talar neck
branch to form artery of sinus tarsi
- peroneal artery
- branches to post process
branch to form artery of sinus tarsi
Undisplaced fractures disrupt the intraosseous vessels but leave the major vascular sling intact
Displaced fractures disrupt the vascular sling- ie the branches from the dorsalis pedis to the neck, the arteries of sinus tarsi and the tarsal canal
The wedge shape of the dome (in the AP plane) results in increased instability in plantar flexion
An Os Trigonum is present in 3 - 30% of people and 60% are bilateral
[ Back to the Top ]
Talar neck fractures
mechanism
hyperdorsiflexion of foot on legClassification
Hawkins "Fractures of the neck of the talus" JBJS 52A:991-1002, 1970Type I
Undisplaced vertical fracture of the neckAVN occurs in 0 - 10%
90% good results with trabecular healing in 6 - 8 weeks
Type II
Displaced vertical fractures with subluxation or dislocation of the sub talar jointAVN occurs in 20 - 50%
47% unsatisfactory result with healing usually in 8 - 12 weeks
Type III
Displaced fracture with subluxation or dislocation of the subtalar joint and dislocation of the ankle jointAVN occurs in 80 - 100%
52% unsatisfactory results and healing occurs in upward of 16 weeks
Type IV
As for III but with subluxation/dislocation of the head of the talus from the talo-navicular joint (not initially described by Hawkins)Treatment
Type 1 BKPOP 8-12 wks until signs of fracture healing present, NWB first 6/52
Type 2 Reduction - closed may be successful -try once. ORIF usually needed
Type 3 ~ 25% of these are open . ORIF required
Type 4 ORIF
protect from WB until healing is secure
Complications
Skin necrosis / infection
more significant with open injuriesprevent by immed reduction of displaced injuries
if infected - need to debride the sequestered talar body, combined withtibiocalcaneal fusion
delayed/ non union
delayed union = not healed in 6 mths- 5-10%nonunion - v rare
malunion
varus malunion most common- leads to ST jt degenerationbest results correlate with anatomical reduction
AVN
Type 1~10% ; Type 2 ~20-50% ; Type 3 ~80-100%Hawkins sign: Subchondral osteoporosis evident at 6 - 8 weeks which signifies vascularity and indicates a good prognosis
Bone scan and MRI both define AVN
Protect from WB until healed. If avascular will take up to 3 yrs to revascularise during which time collapse may occur. Some recommend protection in a weight relieving orthosis for this time, others say collapse will occur regardless If collapse with symptomatic ankle jt degeneration- Blair fusion- this maintains the shape of the foot
Post- traumatic OA of ankle or ST jts- can occur without AVN
[ Back to the Top ]
Talar Body Fractures
uncommon- Mechanism
- most commonly fall froma height axial compression of talus bw tibia and os calcis
- Treatment
- ORIF with early ROM
- Prognosis
- high incidence of AVN, OA ankle and ST jts
[ Back to the Top ]
Talar Head Fractures
rare- is a compression fracture of the talar head- Treatment
- undisplaced fracture - BKPOP 6/52
displaced fracture- ORIF
- Prognosis
- healing uneventful
OA talonavicular jt- treatment with firm longitudinal arch support
fusion if this fails
[ Back to the Top ]
Lateral Talar Process Fractures
rare-involve the post talocalcaneal jt, may be difficult to see on routine films- mechanism
- foot dorsiflexion and inversion
- Treatment
- the size of the fragment and the degree of displacement decide treatment
the larger the fragment the more likely it is to involve the ST jt and need ORIF
Undisplaced fracture- BKPOP 6/52
Displaced fracture- ORIF , if signif comminution excise
- Prognosis
- high proportion of pts will have ST jt pain regardless of treatment
[ Back to the Top ]
Osteochondral Fractures of the Talus
occur on the med or lat talar domeClassification
Stage I
Localised subchondral trabecular compression not evident on plane X-Rays bone scan & MRIStage II
Incomplete separation of the fragment which is usually missed on X-Ray bone scan if suspectedStage IIA
when the development of a subchondral cystStage III
Unattached and undisplaced fragment which is usually evident on X-Ray and is well displayed on CT no need for bone scan or MRIStage IV
Displaced fragmentManagement
Stage I lesions is conservative.Stage II and III lesions the osteochondral flap is arthroscopically excised and the base drilled to expose bleeding bone.
Stage IV lesions the separated fragment is removed and the bed drilled.
[ Back to the Top ]
Subtalar Dislocation
is the simultaneous dislocation of the ST jt and Talonavicular jtsClassification
medial or lateralMechanism
Inversion med dislocationEversion lat dislocation
Assoc with osteochondral fractures in 45%
Treatment
Closed reduction- prompt, gentle under anaesthesia, knee flexed to relax tendo achilles, traction, accentuate the deformity, reduce by reversing the deformityclunk!following reduction the injury is stableBK splint for 4 wks followed with ROM program. Do not prolong immobilisation
~ 10% of med dislocations + 15-20% lat dislocations not reducible closed- causes include-
- medial
- capsule of talonavicular jt blocks
EDB interposes
assoc fracture of either talus or navicular
- lateral
- interpositionof tib post tendon
Prognosis
good if prompt accurate reductionoften have some ST jt stiffnes
lateral dislocations tend to do worse than med- more force required for lat dislocation
[ Back to the Top ]
Os calcis
Classification
Extra-articular 25-30% of all os calcis fractures- Include
- anterior process- an avulsion fracture of the bifurcate lig or EDB
tuberosity (beak or avulsion)- avulsion of achilles tendon insertion
med process- is origin of Abd hallucis, med part FDB, med plantar fascia- due to shear force in fall on heel in a valgus position
sustentaculum - rare as isolated fracture- due to fall on heel in inversion
body
- Intra-articular
- 70-75% of all os calcis fractures- 4 types
Mechanism
fall from a height in 80-90%10 % are associated with lumbar spine fractures
Fractures are bilateral in 5 - 10% and associated with other lower limb injuries in 25%
X-Rays
AP/Lat/axial viewsOblique views of subtalar jt- lat oblique shows ant facet of ST jt
med oblique shows middle and post facets ST jt
CT good for preop planning- sections semi-coronal (perp to post facet) and parallel to sole of foot (=transverse sections)
Bohlers angle usually 25 - 40o
Crucial angle of Gissane
Treatment
Extraarticular
- anterior process
- BKPOP 4/52
- tuberosity
- undisplaced - slight equinus POP 6/52
displaced- ORIF and equinus BKPOP 6-8/52
- med process
- undisplaced to mod displaced- rest +/- POP NWB 4/52, then WB prn
severe displaced- CR/BKPOP 6/52
- sustentaculum
- BKPOP 6/52
- body
- rest/ elevation to minimise swelling
ROM exs , NWB 6/52 if not grossly displaced
if grossly displaced eg heel very wide- CR/POP 6/52
Intraarticular
- Undisplaced
- elevation, active mobilisation, NWB 6-12/52
- Displaced
- controversial- Operative treatment not shown to be any better than conservative treatment
treat as for undisplaced with early ROM exs etc
-if the heel is grossly widened CR , then early ROM
ref: Pozo et al JBJS 66B:386-391, 1984
21 pts, displaced intraarticular fractures 14.6 yr FU, 76% good results with nonop treatment
There have been no prospectively randomised trials of the treatment of these injuries
Prognosis
Various authors recommend closed treatment with and without manipulation, ORIF or early arthrodesisWhen the results of different forms of treatment of this group of fractures are compared the results are strikingly similar with the average time off work in most series being 4 - 6 months and symptoms steadily improve up to 2 years with approximately 80% good results at that stage
Improvement has been reported in patients up to 6 years following the injury
If going to operate start with lateral approach enables freeing peroneal tendons and use a second incision on the medial side if difficulty reducing the fracture
-ref: Stevenson "Treatment of displaced intraarticular fractures of the calcaneus using medial and lateral approaches, internal fixation and early motion"
JBJS 69A:115-130, 1987
Eastwood etal "Intra articular fractures of the calcaneum" parts 1 and 2
JBJS 75B: 183-195, 1993
-gives excellent description of the operative technique
No method of treatment has been shown to be superior to functional treatment or early mobilisation of the joints with elevation then non weight bearing for 6 - 8 weeks
As there are none of the operative complications of the other methods of treatment this must be the treatment of choice
Complications
Malunion broad flat heelJoint incongruity early degenerative arthritis
rare- nerve entrapment
theoretically the flattening of the tuber angle should reduce triceps surae power- this does not seem to be a clinical problem
Long term symptoms could be classified into 3 main groups
- Impingement of the peroneal tendons where good relief is obtained by removing the bony protrusion causing entrapment of the tendons
- Painful heel due to a disrupted fat pad
- Stiffness of the ankle, subtalar joint and mid-tarsal joints due to disrupted soft tissues
[ Back to the Top ]
Tarso-metatarsal Joints; Lisfrancs Fracture
Mechanism
direct blow or crushindirect force- eg windsurfer
Classification
(Quenu & Kuss 1909)Isolated: eg 1st ray displaced while lat 4 rays stay in place
Homo-lateral displacement: ie all rays displace in the one direction
Divergent: eg 1st ray goes med, the rest displace lat
Xrays
AP/lat and 30 deg obliqueTreatment
There is no place for conservative management of fracture and fracture dislocations of the tarso- metatarsal joint complexref: Myerson "the diagnosis and treatment of injuries to the Lisfranc Joint Complex"
OCNA 20:655, 1989
Prognosis
Whatever the severity of the initial injury the prognosis depends on an accurate reduction and its maintenance[ Back to the Top ]
Jones Fracture
Transverse fracture through the proximal shaft of the fifth metatarsal just distal to the tarsometatarsal joint and the insertion of the peroneus brevis.[ Back to the Top ]
Dancers Fracture
Spiral fracture of the neck of the fifth metatarsal[ Back to the Top ]
Stress Fractures
May occur in any of the bones of the foot, most commonly the second or third metatarsal but also the distal fubula, calcaneum, the navicular, and even the sesamoids of the great toe.[ Back to the Top ]

