Tibia Fractures
Proximal Tibial Fractures
Mechanism
young pt - high energy traumaold pt minor fall
Classification AO
60% are lat plateau15% are med plateau
25% involve both
Evaluation
assess assoc injuries, neurovasc examinationXRay: plain films, biplanar tomography, CT
Treatment
Extraarticular
CR if necessary, AKPOP or cast braceIntraarticular
- Undisplaced
- AKPOP/ cast brace
- Displaced
- ORIF / BG/ cast brace for split depression
simple depression fracture may be amenable to elevation without plating using an arthroscopic assisted technique
type C fracture- often very comminuted, difficult to reconstruc, thus CR/cast bracing often preferable
collateral or cruciate lig injuries in ~20%
Complications
- nonunion
- rare
- malunion
- more common with nonop treatment
Bicondylar fracture
knee instability due to either malunion or ligament injury
- infection
- more common in bicondylar fracture - increased op time, exposure, hardware
Prognosis
ref: Anglen and Healy "tibial plateau fractures" Orthopaedics 11:1527-1534, 1988Undisplaced fracture 85% satisfactory with nonop treatment
Displaced fracture 78% satisfactory with ORIF, 54% with nonop treatment
Lachiewicz and Funcik "factors influencing the results of ORIF of tibial plateau fractures"
CORR 259: 210-215, 1990
44 fractures, 2.7 yr FU, 91% good or excellent, implant removal needed in 1/3 pts
[ Back to the Top ]
Tibial Spine Fractures
Mechanism
hyper extension or hyperflexion® avulsionClassification
Meyers and McKeever "Fractures of the intercondylar eminence of the tibia"JBJS 52A: 1677-1684, 1970
Type 1: undisplaced
Type 2: displaced hinging posteriorly
Type 3: displaced with complete separation
Treatment
Type 1 + 2 CR with knee in extension likely to be successful- if not ORIFType 3 ORIF
Prognosis
good , low incidence of late instabilityif malunion may get impingement in extension
[ Back to the Top ]
Avulsion of the Tibial Tubercle
ref: Ogden etal "fractures of the tibial tuberosity in adolescents" JBJS 62A:205-215, 1980Mechanism
usually in vigorous sports- violent contraction of quads in sudden acceleration or decelerationClassification
- Type 1 fracture
- across the secondary ossification centre level with the post border of the inserting patellar tendon
- Type 2 fracture
- at the junction of the primary and secondary ossification centres
of the prox tibial epiphysis
- Type 3
- fracture propagates across the primary ossification centre= SH type 3
Treatment
ORIF , protect in extension , ROM exsPrognosis
excellent[ Back to the Top ]
Tibial Shaft Fractures
Classification AO
Type A simple
a single circumferential disruption of the diaphysis - may be:Type B multifragmentary: wedge
a fracture with one or more intermediate fragments in which after reduction, there is some contact bw the main fragments- may be:Type C Multifragmentary: complex
a fracture with one or more intermediate fragments in which after reduction , there is no contact bw the main prox and distal fragments- may be:Treatment - closed injury
Nonoperative
best for fracture without significant comminution, shortening or displacement at the time of fracture. ie low energy fractureAKPOP for 6/52, then convert to cast brace or PTB
union in approx 16 wks for simple fracture, longer for more complex injury (av 18 wks)
ref: Sarmiento etal "Tibial shaft fractures treated with functional braces: experience with 780 fractures" JBJS 71B: 602-609, 1989
90% healed with 1cm or less shortening
nonunion rate 2.5%
Operative
indicated in:pt requires early return to work
displaced ie higher energy fracture
Failure of closed treatment
IM nailing:
ref: Hooper etal "Conservative management or closed nailing for tibial shaft fractures : a randomised prospective trial " JBJS 73B: 83-85, 1991
infection rate ~ 1-2%
angulatory deformities rare
shorter hospital stay, less OPD visits
earlier return to work
Treatment - Open Fractures
Wound management as for any compound fractureIM Nailing
Court-Brown etal "Infection after intramedullary nailing of the tibia" JBJS 74B: 770-774, 1992
Tornetta etal " treatment of grade 3B open tibial fractures- a prospective randomised comparison of external fixation and nonreamed nailing" JBJS 76A:13-19, 1994
- Grade 1
- IM nailing - same figures as for closed fracture
- Grade 2
- infection 3.8%
- Grade 3
- A: infection 5.6%
B: infection 12.5%
Use for grade 3B and 3C
rates of infection same as nailing for grade 3B with added problem of pin tract infection, delayed union also a feature of ex fixation.
sometimes need to convert from ex fix to IM nail- risk of infection in the face of recent pin tract infection is ~ 20%, However if the ex fix is removed within 3 wks of application + wait another 2 wks,can nail with infection rate of ~ 5%
Ref: Johansen etal " Objective criteria accurately predict amputation following lower extremity trauma " J Trauma 30: 568-573, 1990
The MESS
| 1. Skeletal/ soft tissue injury | |
| a. Low energy eg simple fracture, civilian gunshot | 1 |
| b. Medium energy eg open or multiple fractures, dislocation | 2 |
| c. High energy eg close range shotgun, military gunshot, crush | 3 |
| d. Very High energy above + gross contamination | 4 |
| 2. Limb Ischaemia ( score doubled for ischaemia more than 6 hrs) | |
| a. Pulse reduced or absent but perfusion normal | 1 |
| b. Pulseless, parasthesias, reduced capillary refill | 2 |
| c. Cool, paralysed, insensate | 3 |
| 3. Shock | |
| a. Systolic BP always more than 90 mm Hg | 1 |
| b. Hypotensive transiently | 2 |
| c. Persistent Hypotension | 3 |
| 4. Age | |
| less than 30 | 0 |
| 30-50 | 1 |
| more than 50 | 2 |
A score of 7 or higher indicates amputation
Malunion
malalignment of more than 15 deg varus or valgus may require corrective osteotomyintact fibula predisposes to varus
- malrotation
- IR more than 10 deg may cause gait problems
ER up to 20 deg acceptable
- shortening
- less than 2cm not a problem
Delayed union or Nonunion
more common in high energy fracturewith intact fibula- osteotomise fibula + FWB in cast- 80% unite
hypertrophic: unite with fixation
hypotrophic: unite with fixation and grafting
Infection
see above for ratesBone defects
graft or bone transportSkin loss
Neuro-Vascular injuries
Joint stiffness
knee stiffness rare, occasional ankle or ST jt stiffness[ Back to the Top ]
Tibial Plafond Fractures
Mechanism
axial compression (= pilon fracture)Classification AO
A Extra articular
1. Metaphyseal simple
2. Metaphyseal wedge
3. Metaphyseal complex
B Partial articular
1. pure split
2. split depression
3. depression multifragmentary
C Complete articular
1. articular simple, metaphyseal simple2. articular simple, metaphyseal complex
3. articular and metaphyseal complex
Treatment
Nonoperative
type A fracture - CR/POPtype B and type C if jt congruity restorable via CR
Operative
if jt surface reconstructible- ORIF/BGif not reconstructible use closed treatment and may need later fusion
Prognosis
Bourne etal " Pilon fractures of the distal tibia" CORR 240:42-46, 198936% satisfactory results in intra artic fracture treated with closed means
76% satisfactory for operative treatment
32% at 4.5 yrs had undergone ankle arthrodesis for failed result
[ Back to the Top ]

