Living a healthy life means more than just the absence of disease – it encompasses our physical, mental and social wellbeing. And while many Australians enjoy good health, there is still an unacceptable divide in health inequalities.
The difference can be measured in the people who don’t fill prescription medication because it costs too much – which doubles when comparing Australia’s wealthiest individuals and the most disadvantaged. The higher rate of disease for Australians living in remote and rural locations than people living in major cities. And the 8.6 years lower life expectancy for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander males (and 7.8 years for females) than non-Indigenous Australians.
Our research is committed to understanding the effects of people’s circumstances on their health to inform future research and evaluate and develop policies to improve health – especially for those who need it most.
We are passionate about better understanding and responding to the health needs of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Our research identifies and seeks to address the disconnect between health services and health promotion programs that are currently available and those that are specifically designed for and working for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.
Seven million Australians (29% of the population) live in rural or remote communities. Health indicators for these communities are consistently lower than their metropolitan counterparts, and we are conducting research to address this. We are looking at the full range of health challenges facing Australians and investigating the relevance and effectiveness of existing services and programs for remote and rural communities.
Public Health research is diverse. As a result, the Public Health research program in FHMRI includes a number of research groups, centres and projects covering a range of topics and fields. The ultimate goal of public health research is to improve the health of populations by generating knowledge that can be used to inform policies, programs and interventions aimed at preventing disease, promoting health, and reducing health disparities.
Our Public Health research involves a wide range of methods, including observational studies, clinical trials, surveys and qualitative research. It is highly collaborative and applied – we work in partnership with other researchers, healthcare providers, policymakers, and community members.
Our Public Health researchers are world’s best. There are a wide range of MRFF, NHMRC and ARC funded ongoing research projects focusing on solving our greatest health challenges.
Our researchers are analysing a wide range of health data.
We are using state of the art biostatistics and epidemiological methods to better understand health and health services and to estimate the effectiveness of health technologies, services and programs.
We are developing and applying valid and sustainable health economics methods to support the structured evaluation of costs and benefits to inform health service planning.
We are using information and communications technologies to improve the prevention and management of ill health.
Health professions education research is essential for improved and innovative approaches to educating our future doctors, nurses, speech pathologists, paramedics and other health professionals. We undertake theory-based research as well as applied research, bringing researchers and health professionals together to ensure the application of best-available evidence to practice.
Our researchers conduct projects related to:
Portable and rapid diagnostic test systems for remote Indigenous communities.
Professor Jonathan Karnon
FHMRI Deputy Director (Theme Lead, Healthy Communities)
Jonathan is a health economist with extensive experience in health data analysis Significant contributions include leading the only empirical study of the opportunity costs of decisions to fund new health technologies and services in Australia, using an assembled dataset and advanced econometric methods. The published estimates have been highly cited as they provide the only empirical basis for interpreting the results of economic evaluations in Australia.
Funded by Cancer Australia, he recently led the cost-effectiveness analysis of lung cancer screening that informed the decision to fund a national lung cancer screening program in Australia. Recent NHMRC and MRFF funding supported deep engagement with local health services, including an ‘embedded economist’ project that involved a wide range of local level economic evaluations to inform the value and sustainable use of economic evaluation to inform local decision-making.
Sturt Rd, Bedford Park
South Australia 5042
South Australia | Northern Territory
Global | Online
CRICOS Provider: 00114A TEQSA Provider ID: PRV12097 TEQSA category: Australian University
Flinders University uses cookies to ensure website functionality, personalisation and a variety of purposes as set out in its website privacy statement. This statement explains cookies and their use by Flinders.
If you consent to the use of our cookies then please click the button below:
If you do not consent to the use of all our cookies then please click the button below. Clicking this button will result in all cookies being rejected except for those that are required for essential functionality on our website.